You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Home | Sign In | Contact Us | Careers | Site Map | Help


Advertisement

The Importance of Focus in Leadership Transitions

As we visit Julia Martinez for the final time, thanks once again for the wonderful responses to the Julia Martinez scenario on making the shift from peer to boss. First we went over the challenges Julia faces. Then we concentrated on what Julia should do on her first day after the announcement of her promotion. Now, at last, we consider how she should prepare for her upcoming off-site.

The lure of the off-site meeting is strong for many leaders taking new roles. Like Julia Martinez in the promotion scenario we have been discussing, they have agendas they want to pursue and teams that they want to mobilize. “Just let me get the team in a quiet place with their attention undivided,” they say, “and we can move mountains.”

There is no question that off-site meetings are a potentially powerful vehicle with which to mobilize needed change. Done well, they focus attention, break through barriers, and build commitment, leaving teams energized, aligned, and ready to achieve great things.

But before launching reflexively into an off-site meeting, you, like Julia Martinez, would be well-advised to take a step back and think hard about (1) what you are trying to accomplish and (2) whether an off-site is the best way to accomplish it. Why? Because off-sites are no panacea and, without proper planning and facilitation, they can go badly wrong. In the worst cases, they cement divisive conflict, empower opposing coalitions, and undermine the leadership of the erstwhile off-siter.

The place to start is with the question of what you are trying to accomplish with an off-site meeting. There are at least six big reasons why you might want to take your team off-site:

* To gain a shared understanding of the business (diagnostic focus)
* To create a vision and strategy (strategy focus)
* To alter the way the team works together (team-process focus)
* To build or alter relationships in the team (relationship focus)
* To develop a plan and commit to achieving it (planning focus)
* To resolve significant conflicts (conflict-resolution focus)

One trap to avoid is trying to do too much in a single off-site. You can’t realistically accomplish more than two of the goals laid out above in a day or two. Decide what will your focus be beforehand.

A second trap is putting the cart before the horse. It’s easy to jump directly to trying to create a vision and strategy. But to have a successful strategy-focused off-site, it’s crucial that the right foundation of shared understanding (diagnostic focus) and work relationships (relationship focus) are in place.

You know what you want to do? Great. Now make sure an off-site is the best way to accomplish it. There are potential costs to off-sites that go beyond the requisite financial expenses. Chief among these is that you are committing yourself to accomplishing something significant, so you should be pretty confident that you will. Otherwise you risk pumping up expectations and then having the air leak out.

Opposing coalitions are a second reason why you might avoid off-sites. If there is a significant risk that bringing people together could crystallize latent opposition, then you would be well advised to proceed to build support through one-on-one and smaller group meetings until you're confident an off-site would succeed. This is akin to the way diplomats use shuttle diplomacy to lay the foundation for major summit meetings.

What are the implications for Julia Martinez? She wants to make a shift in her organization’s strategic direction but needs to convince her boss. She also wants to alter the way the team works to encourage more shared accountability. So it would be natural for her to focus the off-site on strategy and team process. It would also be a big mistake. She has not laid the groundwork with her boss for creating a new strategy, nor has she established sufficient authority in her new role to introduce democracy.

She should go ahead with the off-site. But the primary objectives should be diagnosis and relationship-building. She should work with her new team to do some rigorous diagnosis of changes in the business environment and come to a common view of the situation. That would provide her with insight and support that would help her to convince her boss of the need to shift the strategy. She definitely should not try to develop a vision and strategy or do any planning at this point. Her second major objective should be to re-engineer her relationships with her former peers, and establish herself, firmly but judiciously, in control. Once these foundations are in place she can turn her attention to strategy and process, perhaps by holding a subsequent off-site.

Assuming that you’ve concluded an off-site is the way to go, you can shift to three supporting questions:
* When and where should it be held?
* Which issues will be dealt with in what order?
* Who should act as facilitator for the session?

The “when” and “where” are of course dictated by schedules and availability. The schedule will flow directly from your agenda for the session.

Don’t neglect the “who should facilitate it” question. If you are a skilled facilitator of group process and if the team respects you -- and if the team is not enmeshed in a conflict -- then it may make sense for you to be both leader and facilitator for the session. If not, you would be well advised to bring in a skilled outsider. Keep in mind that involving a respected external facilitator both signals seriousness and can elevate your status.

Given that Julia Martinez is working to establish herself in her new role, she would be well advised to involve a skilled facilitator. The right person would help to buffer the emotional currents that are bound to be present in the room and also subtly assist her in establishing herself in her new leadership role.

Let's keep the conversation going. Do you agree with advice about why and whether to have off-sites? Do you agree with the implications for Julia Martinez?

Read all of Michael Watkins' "Leading Edge" posts.


MORE ON LEADERSHIP TRANSITIONS:
The First 90 Days: Critical Success Strategies for New Leaders at All Levels (Hardcover)
Off-Sites that Work (HBR Article)
Strategy Meetings that Work (HBR Article Collection)
The Leadership Transitions Collection

Comments

One interesting follow-up topic could be what preparation Julia might have gotten from the organization before her promotion, and what kind of support she might expect after assuming her new leadership position. Does her employer practice the "sink or swim" approach to leadership development, or does it invest in the kind of training needed to help new leaders hit the ground running in the right direction?

- Posted by Pete Daly
December 1, 2007 9:41 AM

Great piece of advice - any of us will recall successful (and failed) instances of offsites related to these factors.

A couple more might be:

* Invitation to external stakeholders: selected representatives from nearby parts of the organisation, with whom Julia's team share business processes (and perhaps conflicts) may improve completeness of viewpoints, and also send out signals of the new way when back in office.

* Endorsement from CEO: getting Julia's boss (or ideally the CEO) for a session, or more informally over dinner, can make the team get candid feedback about how the team is seen and what is expected from them by the company, thus strengthening Julia´s position and focusing the team into achieving the right strategy shift.

And then there is the key factor to assess if an offsite is not only a short spark but a lasting flame - persistence: a list of actionable conclusions and periodic follow up!

- Posted by Victor Bravo
December 1, 2007 5:22 PM

Thank you Miachael

From our experience, we would strongly agree on both:
* the potential power of well facilitated off-site leadership team gatherings
* the critical role focus - not trying to achieve too much in a single gathering

Our speciality is leadership development. In recent times the focus of leadership development has gone beyond building individual skills to include any activities that enhance the impact leadership has within an organisation. The collective offsite gatherings are a great example of developing leadership impact in a non-individual manner.

The principle of focus should also be applied when seeking to develop an indivdual's ability to lead with impact. Whilst it is true that leadership can be developed we find that many people underestimate what is required and equate the process to the more familiar academic and event modes of learning. Leadership development involves moving beyond enhancing you knowledge of what to do, to make changes in your habitual leadership behaviors. Such change takes focus, practice and persistence somewhat akin to learning a musical instrument.

Returning to your new leader and their leadership team story. I would add that once the focus has been identified the team as a whole needs to revisit and nurture change in this area over a 6-12 period, rather than relying on a single off-site event.

Kindest Regards
Shaun

- Posted by Shaun Killian, Director, Australian Leadership Development Centre
December 2, 2007 6:44 PM

Michael
great posting and comments, but one unresolved issue sticks in my mind. Many offsites are great, and the team comes away really energized, but upon returning, they are sucked into business as usual and the energy dissipates. The periodic followew-ups suggested by Victor Bravo above are of course useful, even necessary, but they don't address the "soft" issue around how to maintain the energy going... Any free advice ;)
Cheers
Veit

- Posted by Veit Dengler
December 9, 2007 5:48 PM

I just wanna join this blog, wolud you like to change link with my blog about home online business ideas

- Posted by home online business
April 15, 2008 2:02 PM

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/598

No trackbacks have been made to this entry.

Return to Michael Watkins

Join The Discussion

* Required Fields




Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Return to Michael Watkins


Posting Guidelines

We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.

We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.

  1. No selling of products or services. Let's keep this an ad-free zone.
  2. No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them.
  3. No multimedia. If you want us to know about outside sources, please point to them, Don't paste them in.
We look forward to including your voices on the site - and learning from you in the process.

The editors



About This Author

Michael Watkins Michael Watkins is Professor of General Management at IMD in Lausanne, Switzerland and co-founder of Genesis Advisers, a leadership development consulting company. He is the author of The First 90 Days: Critical Success Strategies for New Leaders at All Levels and developer of the Leadership Transitions e-learning system. His newest book is Shaping the Game: The New Leader's Guide to Effective Negotiating.

Archive

«   January 2008  
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31