Voices » Bill Taylor » Work Less, Give Your Customers Less... and Succeed Like 37Signals
1:11 PM Tuesday June 3, 2008
I've always believed that the first step in any successful venture is to establish a clear definition of what it means to succeed. And there's something about business that convinces most executives that being successful means doing more: generating more revenue, hiring more people, launching products with more features. If you want to win big, the only choice is to "one-up" your competition and "out-do" your rivals. Right?
Not if you're one of the programming wizards at 37Signals, a fast-growing company that is winning converts in the marketplace based on its commitment to "one-down" the competition and "under-do" its rivals. Talk about a strategic mind-flip: In a competitive environment defined by bloated products, hyped-up marketing, and financial excess, the way to succeed more is to do less.
There's no question that 37Signals is succeeding. The company doesn't just have customers, it has raving fans, and its leaders are certified Web celebrities. Its offerings, such as its Basecamp project-management software and its Highrise contact-management software, are refreshing models of simplicity in an industry ruled (and haunted) by complexity.
During a recent visit to Chicago, I visited 37Signals and spent some time with founder Jason Fried and his colleague David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of the much-celebrated Ruby on Rails programming framework. (Twitter and many other Web 2.0 services are built on Ruby on Rails.) As it turns out, Jason, David and their colleagues don't just have a simpler-is-better philosophy for writing software--they have a philosophy for building a business, and it's every bit as well-defined as their code.
"When you're competing against companies that have so much more, the only answer is to do less," Jason and David told me. "Do less than your competitors to beat them. Instead of one-upping other companies, one-down them. Instead of out-doing other products, under-do them."
I get it, I responded: Less is more, right? Jason and David shook their heads. "No, less is less--because more is not better! Everyone tries to do too much: solve too many problems, build products with too many features. Our goal is to do less, to build half a product rather than a half-assed product. So we say 'no' to almost everything. If you include every decent idea that comes along, you'll just wind up with a half-assed version of your product. What you really want to do is build half a product that kicks ass."
That's why, as products strategists, Jason and David focus on customers with smaller budgets, less bureaucracy, and fewer headaches. Most technology companies are obsessed with the "enterprise" market--Fortune 500 giants with complicated problems and big budgets. 37Signals builds software for entrepreneurs and small companies where the executives who buy the product also use the product--a market that they call the Fortune 5,000,000: "We solve the simple problems and leave the hairy, difficult, nasty problems to everyone else," the company likes to say.
It's a provocative challenge to a business culture addicted to more--whether that's features of finances. "Revenue growth in and of itself is not a goal," Jason and David insist. "We are about profits--profits per employee. And growth forever is not sustainable. There is a right size for certain things, at least if you want to do them well."
That's why, as entrepreneurs, Jason and David push themselves to spend less money and hire fewer colleagues. They also insist on working fewer hours. The company recently adopted an official four-day workweek, the better to keep everyone fresh, energized, and forced to avoid distractions.
"Don't hire people," they implore in Getting Real, their Web-based book that is chock-a-block with great advice. "Look for another way. Is the work that's burdening you really necessary? What if you just don't do it? Can you solve the problem with a slice of software or a change of practice instead?"
Products that offer fewer features. Fewer employees who work fewer hours. Leaders who reject growth for growth's sake. It's the formula for success at 37Signals--and food for thought for the rest of us. Are you ready to succeed by one-downing the competition and under-doing your rivals?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1700
No trackbacks have been made to this entry.
Posting Guidelines
We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.
We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.

William C. Taylor is an agenda-setting writer, speaker, and entrepreneur. His new project, Practically Radical, chronicles the radical shifts transforming business and the practical steps that will determine who wins. His most recent book,Mavericks at Work, has been a New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and BusinessWeek bestseller. As cofounder of Fast Company, he launched a magazine that earned a passionate following around the world. He is an adjunct lecturer at Babson College and a former associate editor of Harvard Business Review.
To learn more about Practically Radical, download a preview here.
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael Jackson and the Zombieconomy Umair Haque
How Michael Jackson Became a Brand Icon John Quelch
Debunking Social Media Myths David Armano
A Good Way to Change a Corporate Culture Peter Bregman
Great Communicators Are Great Explainers John Baldoni
Debunking Social Media Myths David Armano
Michael Jackson and the Zombieconomy Umair Haque
How Michael Jackson Became a Brand Icon John Quelch
How to Identify Your Employees' Hidden Talents Steven DeMaio
Why Microsoft Had to Destroy Word Peter Merholz
This simulation will help you learn how to craft conversations that are fact based, minimize defensiveness, and draw out the best thinking from everyone involved.
In many organizations, marketing exists far from the executive suite and the boardroom. Learn how to improve the link between high level corporate strategy and the marketing function.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments
I've been a 37signals fan for some time. I love the updated spin on less is more as Jason points out, "less is less". In my business I regularly realize how bloated our software has become and ironically our corporate approach is not much different. Grow organically (stay the 37signals coarse for a few years). Get some critical mass. Raise venture financing. Hire like crazy. Play in the "arms race" for features and functionality. Get bloated and then wonder why things are not growing. The one thing I can say is that we've maintained our willingness and ability to recognize change opportunities and capitalize, even if that means taking a bit of a step backwards. Thanks for reminding me about some pretty fundamental components to what got us here.
- Posted by Jeff Solomon
June 4, 2008 2:30 AM
37Signals has always been cool. They have style no doubt about it. They're also smart, IMHO. But they seem to emphasize a key underlining characteristic in how the world functions. When everybody goes right because it's "a proven and time tested concept", often, the best idea is to go left. If something has been around long enough to be totally proven and tested against time, chances are it's been around for too long. Methods, like markets, can become over saturated. It doesn't take long for this to happen. So when somebody decides to go with the proven trustworthy solution, they're guaranteeing they'll be okay. But that's all they're guaranteeing, that they'll be okay. If they want to be great, they'll go for the untested, the still unqualified, the still inexperienced or even better yet, something nobody has ever touched before. With great risk comes great reward. And even if you lose everything, it'll always be better than being okay.
- Posted by Quintin Teszeri
June 5, 2008 5:22 PM
"There’s no question that 37Singals is succeeding."
Hmmm, "Singals" would be a great name for girls-only punk band ;-)
Nice article though.
- Posted by jan korbel
June 5, 2008 5:24 PM
Nice catch, Jan. The typo has been corrected.
- Posted by Paul Michelman
June 5, 2008 5:28 PM
37S is the dope right there!
There is an interesting "sub-rosa" network under construction (not very different from the Apple-Google-Cingular" relationship). Only this time its "The Deck-37S-18 other Deck Companies-Blinksale-other `less software`type companies". Maybe this is the true legacy of Web 2.0. But...what do I know ...
- Posted by Jamo
June 6, 2008 2:02 AM
Do one thing, do it right, and you cannot fail. Bill is correct in that the more you try to be everything to everyone the greater chance of disappointing your customers and the greater chance of failure. I wrote on a similar topic for my FastCompany blog Mindless Elsewhere.
Great piece Bill.
- Posted by Chase Wegmann
June 6, 2008 10:30 AM
Love the concept....I've fought for years with a managment team that wants to do 'everything' instead of getting really good at what you are good at.
- Posted by Rachel Williamson
June 12, 2008 8:05 AM
Couldn't agree more. In fact, I think you will find there are others doing the same thing. They are on the small side and happy to be below the radar and under-estimated. At a recent national event, mentioned to the lead speaker that I've got two associations sharing a publication. He had never heard of such an animal. And the animal is even profitable. The key is not doing all the fancy promos but keeping "the guts" clean and direct and not worrying about winning awards. Glad it's recognized as a real process. For me, below the radar works just fine.
- Posted by Martha Lostrom
June 12, 2008 8:57 AM
Maybe the real problem is that companies don't know what they are great at. True, some companies have a defined purpose and drive, but other seem to fall into different areas in the name of profit. When you get so involved in chasing profit, you can easily lose sight of what you are good at.
Or even worse yet, some companies are truly not great at anything at all. They can manage several different avenues at a mediocre level, but when challenged, cannot perform one task to excellence - even their primary task.
- Posted by Matt Tennison
June 12, 2008 9:28 AM
Same concept - different industry. We're selling specialized print media through distribution. We have rejected all temptations to go "direct" or add unrelated products to our product offering, even thought there are literally thousands of products used in our industry and sold by our Distributors. Pick your cliche': we know our core competency - we do indeed do one thing, and do it right - resulting in 16 straight years of success.
- Posted by Nicholas Puleo
June 12, 2008 2:26 PM
I agree 100% but caution readers into thinking this is a simple thing for any company to pull off. This isn't merely a business or marketing strategy for this company - it appears to drip from the virtual mortar that surrounds them.
A culture that could foster less is less is pretty tough for most people to pull off because so many people tell you it's so wrong.
- Posted by John Jantsch
June 13, 2008 11:13 AM
10 years ago I was in the staffing industry. Looking around at the successful companies you could see that they were focusing on a small niche, designing and improving their operating system to deliver just what's needed in a quality manner. I realized then and carried the principle forward into my Real Estate Investment business that "the most important decision you make; is the customers you decide to take."
- Posted by Bruce
June 13, 2008 1:53 PM
Bill: Thanks for coming out to Chicago to visit with us. It was a real pleasure chatting with you. And thanks to everyone who's taken the time to post a comment -- it's great to hear from you too.
- Posted by Jason Fried
June 16, 2008 9:51 AM
A super concept. I am so tired of extras and options on products or services, where the base product fails!
Make a plain bagel that tastes superb and stays fresh for more than one day, rather than 28 kinds that all taste mediocre...
- Posted by Steve Simon
June 18, 2008 8:04 AM
As a business owner of a fairly young company, it is very rewarding coming across an article like this. We founded our business on providing a fairly simple service (to us anyway)in a convoluted marketplace. We have dabbled in offering other products and services as a means to generate more profit for us with mixed results. The one constant we have seen is that what we set our to do is really what we are best at, and profit the greatest from. Hats off to 37Signals, thanks for sharing the story which truly mirrors our beliefs.
- Posted by Sam Serianni
June 19, 2008 9:53 AM
Share
- Posted by Ron Volpe
June 27, 2008 5:01 PM