Voices » Larry Prusak » The Cult of the Amateur
5:07 PM Thursday May 24, 2007
There is a battle looming between the techno-utopians and the defenders of traditional forms of cognitive authority. The battle is being waged here and there, in print, on the web, in various forums around the world. This battle represents only the tip of a much larger iceberg: How will the world look and be organized when much of the codified available information in the world is freely available to everyone at little or no cost, and anyone can create yet more information at will?
Andrew Keen's The Cult of the Amateur adds an interesting polemic to this fight. The book's subtitle, How today's Internet is killing our culture, gives a strong taste of what he is up to. He bemoans the apparent decline of the traditional sources of cognitive authority and worries how these sources can be replaced by such democratic vehicles as the ubiquitous Wikipedia.
This book is fun to read. Is it correct? Well, yes and no. Let me give you some examples. He mentions Walter Cronkite as the sort of source one used to get ones news from: trusted, avuncular, with a strong TV news organization behind him. However Walter never mentioned on the air what he knew about some of the dangerous habits of John Kennedy. He never would have done so. Similarly, The New York Times did not much report on the Holocaust for all sorts of crazy reasons. One could easily go on. Had I.F. Stone lived in the same era as the Internet, many rash and awful things done by our government would have been exposed. On the other hand, without these sources of official opinion, who will have the resources to go to Iraq and see what is going on firsthand? How will investors fare if The Wall Street Journal becomes more "democratized" under Rupert Murdoch? Will the reporters there have the resources as well as the will to uncover another Enron, as they so valiantly did a few years back?
We can't put the genie back into the lamp. Technologies can't run backwards. We have the web, and it is used for whatever purposes people want to use it for. Short of outlawing things(gambling, child porn), it's hard to see how to stop the immense wave of blogs, nonsense, falsehoods, and all else that clutter up what was once a medium for scientists to share working papers. I agree with Keen about some things, but I can't see what can be done about it, except educate people about the differences between information -- which can be sent around the world at the click of a mouse -- and knowledge, which has a natural cognitive stature and is quite expensive to develop and transfer. Who knows how this story will end?
RECOMMENDED READING:
The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture
Posting Guidelines
We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.
We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.
Larry Prusak is a researcher and consultant and was the founder and Executive Director of the Institute for Knowledge Management (IKM). He currently co-directs Working Knowledge , a knowledge research program at Babson College, where he is a Distinguished Scholar in Residence. A widely-published author, Prusak has written or edited nine books. His most recent, The Future of Knowledge, will be published next year by the Harvard Business School Press.
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael Jackson and the Zombieconomy Umair Haque
How Michael Jackson Became a Brand Icon John Quelch
Debunking Social Media Myths David Armano
A Good Way to Change a Corporate Culture Peter Bregman
Great Communicators Are Great Explainers John Baldoni
Debunking Social Media Myths David Armano
Michael Jackson and the Zombieconomy Umair Haque
How Michael Jackson Became a Brand Icon John Quelch
How to Identify Your Employees' Hidden Talents Steven DeMaio
Why Microsoft Had to Destroy Word Peter Merholz
This simulation will help you learn how to craft conversations that are fact based, minimize defensiveness, and draw out the best thinking from everyone involved.
In many organizations, marketing exists far from the executive suite and the boardroom. Learn how to improve the link between high level corporate strategy and the marketing function.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments
Re:
"On the other hand, without these sources of official opinion, who will have the resources to go to Iraq and see what is going on firsthand?"
My first question is: do we really know what is going on first hand? I have the benefit of knowing people who speak several languages, and judging by information collected from the world wide web, the consensus appears to be that we, citizens of the U.S.A., only know what our "source of official opinion" are allowed to report. The international consensus appears to be that things are much worse than we are led to believe.
- Posted by Michael
June 1, 2007 8:22 AM