Administrative Leave
People who read this also read:
Ah, vacation. Just around the corner. As I clean off the desk, tidy the files, and delegate tasks for the week ahead I come to one of the more challenging pre-holiday tasks: preparing Outlook.
Of course I’ll set my Out of Office Assistant to let people know that I’ll be away and not checking e-mail. I’ve taken a public pledge to leave the BlackBerry behind. I may even try some of those special rules gizmos to automatically route some messages to the appropriate person (or the trash). But I’ll have to do a serious cleaning to enable my in-box to handle the 400-500 messages I’ll receive next week without exceeding its size limit. We’re running a pool on the exact number. Write your guess on the back of a $20 bill and mail it to me. (Note to any of my readers in law enforcement: I'm kidding).
All of this preparation makes me long for an old-fashioned In Office Assistant. An actual person who could keep things moving along in my absence: answer questions, direct inquiries, follow up on correspondence, set up my fall travel, and even solve the odd problem or two. A person who, in my father’s day, would have been known as my secretary. Someone who would have neat folders ready for my return -- mail to be answered, decisions to be made, approvals to be signed, etc. -- thus making my reentry smooth and efficient.
Fewer of us have administrative assistants in today’s leaner, flatter organizations. We have laptops and “user-centric” applications that let us create our own shipping documents, help desk requests, airline reservations, and handle hundreds of the other routine tasks without which business can’t function. I’m sure there is a spreadsheet somewhere that shows that each of these is more efficient in microeconomic terms (I can’t find it because there’s no one around who is actually trained and skilled in the fine art of filing), but I wonder if anyone has looked at the overall economic impact of managers and executives busying themselves with these tasks. A couple of hours on expense reports, 45 minutes trying to apply a credit to a future flight reservation, an hour cutting-and-pasting language in a contract: multiply that across your organization and you’ll see that pretty soon we’re talking about real time here.
Equally important, we don’t know the value of the loss of the informal network and institutional memory of the old administrative class. They may not have been high on the official totem pole, but they knew how to get things done, where the skeletons were buried, and how to find things in the files. They were skilled contributors to the overall efficiency of the organization. No one could get a new manager up to speed faster than a good admin. However we undervalued their contributions and made theirs the work that few wanted to do. Even if you could find someone who wanted to do the work, if your organization is like many it is easier to get approval to hire a vice president than an administrative assistant.
Perhaps I’m thinking too hard about this. Our laptops let us work in the evening and on the weekend to keep up with our jobs. Hence we are working more hours than ever before. My Outlook Out of Office Assistant doesn’t require benefits and will stand ready to serve 24/7 in my absence. I just need to file the 410 items in my In box before I head to the beach so that your message won’t bounce back as undeliverable.
HARVARD BUSINESS ONLINE RECOMMENDS:
Harvard Business Essentials: Time Management (Paperback)
What Companies Can Do to Help: Ideas for Improving Employee Time Management (HBS Press Chapter)
Managing Time: Pocket Mentor Series (Paperback)
Sign up for the Harvard Business Publishing Weekly Hotlist, a new weekly email roundup featuring the top highlights from HarvardBusiness.org.
- Comments (3)
- Join the Discussion
- Email/Share

Eric McNulty is Managing Director of Conferences for Harvard Business School Publishing. He oversees editorial development, production, and marketing of both virtual and in-person programs. Eric has written for
Comments
The advantage of having a human being take care of such administrative tasks is just touching. Howsoever we depend on our user-centric tools and applications, we understand that no such tool can actually replicate the presence and support of a human being.
Imagine the situation when you call your banking helpline. You have to go through numerous key entries (Dial "1" for personal banking, "2" for institutional banking etc.) to actually hear a human voice at the end of the wire. It seems ridiculous especially if your query is simple, but critical for the particular moment.
But yes, since we live cost-centric lives, it's better to take care of the duties ourselves (obviously with the support of Office Assistant applications), especially since we are increasingly being used to "anywhere anytime" solutions.
- Posted by Manu Stanley
August 14, 2007 8:44 AM
I found your perspective refreshing and insightful. It speaks to the growing need of balance between our dependency of technology and human capital. Both are imperative to business demands but we need to recognize how to better utilize them to meet time sensitive tasks. An executive’s time is best spent forwarding a company's mission vs. wresting with phone automation, etc.
Well done.
- Posted by Elaine T. Brown
August 22, 2007 1:49 PM
Another very insightful article by Eric McNulty. To balance our work between using administrative personnel and doing it ourselves is a problem that we all must work to solve. The time that it takes a busy executive to do his own work, such as booking airtickets or preparing mundant expense reports etc, is not a productive use of their time. But, there are times when it is just more efficient for the executive to do mundant tasks.
Also, the automated response phone systems have gone too far in some cases, where I just hang up and find another vendor or service provider.
Good job Eric.
- Posted by Steve Q
August 24, 2007 11:36 AM