You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Home | Sign In | Contact Us | Careers | Site Map | Help


Advertisement

Be Strategic About Your Time

In the frantic buzz of most managerial lives, I see people running from meeting to meeting, consulting their BlackBerrys as though in prayer, desperately working into the night to cope with a deluge of emails and otherwise being busy, busy, busy. The dilemma of all this activity, however, is that it is for the most part what academics long ago termed “non value-added time."

Years ago, former Harvard Business School professors Steven Wheelwright and Kim Clark (who also served as Dean) documented a catastrophic decline in the amount of value-added time people bring to work once they are assigned to more than two projects. By the time the respondents in their study reported that they were working on 7 projects, their productive time at work dropped to about 15% (See attached chart). Ironically, the more "stuff" one takes on, the less one seems to accomplish.

So what can you do to get more value-added productivity into your days? A few suggestions:

Develop a set of screens or scorecards that can help you systematically winnow the attractive opportunities from the less attractive. I’ve got one that I use for considering new clients, and it helps to set priorities clearly.

• Try to bring old projects to some kind of closure before new ones get on the list.
• Make sure to book some time with yourself for those strategic, but non-urgent tasks (like thinking, or writing) that tend to get crowded out by urgent demands. I have one client who has a mythical person named “Joe” – meetings with Joe are for thinking, and it’s understood that they are not to be interrupted.
• Check email only twice a day (promise- it won’t kill you!)
• Try to make the consequences of your tradeoffs clear to those (like a boss or colleague) who may be creating excess work for you.
Match your strategic priorities with how you spend your time – and question activities that don’t drive those priorities.
• And finally, do question the value of every activity – if it simply didn’t get done, what would happen?

* * *
Sign up for the Harvard Business Publishing Weekly Hotlist, a new weekly email roundup featuring the top highlights from HarvardBusiness.org.

Comments

In Milan time management and the lack of it is not in the hands of the people who do the work but quite often the managers who at 5.00pm discover it is time to work and as such expect the people to stay on in the office(if you want to be considered for a career).Since time is the most valuable resourse it should also be added to a manager's KPI.The tradeoffs are to keep the boss or manager happy,which means time management is tied to his personal objectives.If a business culture ever needed this skill it is Milan.

- Posted by carl rodgers
May 9, 2008 9:05 AM

Dear Miss McGrath:


Impressive and simple. Congratulations.

The idea presented makes me think truly about how I use my time.

I belive that in this times most managers are overwhelmed.

In my last 8 months I woke up in the morning, and the first thought that come to my mind is knowing that it is almost impossible that I will finish my work of that day.

And it is very possible that I will have more and more things on the "pending" side of my Agenda.

It is really difficult to break this.

And I beleive that on this turbulent times managers that can cross the "time management" line will truly develop a Competitive Advantage.


My best regards

- Posted by Juan Robles
May 9, 2008 10:04 PM

Found Rita McGrath's focus and tips useful. Would add a couple.

If your computer's set up to automatically pop-up emails or instant messages, turn these features off.

If you have a phone with a light, turn off the ringer that interrupts your chain of thought. Instead, you can let a "blinking" call go to voice mail, or pick it up immediately if convenient.

Face desk away from the door.

Of course, none of this is "original."
The concept of determining what's important to your key roles, "big rocks" and blocking time for important but not urgent things, etc. ... Stephen Covey has promoted this for at least the three decades I've used his planner system. However, sometimes it takes a McGrath-fresh look to give pause. Acnowledge I've wandered down the multi-tasking path in a new job, and realized it's not good for quality output, or my mental health. So, thanks Rita!

Best regards,
Mike

- Posted by Mike Laughlin
May 13, 2008 4:20 PM

I agree with your diagnosis and recommendations completely. "Multitasking well" is an oxymoron. No one can focus on more than one task at a time. "Multitasking" is simply switching from task to task after short intervals at each. In addition, each task has an administrative component that can't be ignored (project management, reporting, appointments, task recording, etc.) and requires about the same amount of time for each of them. Thus, within a given period (say, a 9-hour day), a the portion allocated to administrative components varies directly with the number of projects you are working on. Furthermore, if your projects are complex (as all value-adding projects are), switching away from one to another has another cost: you lose time as you bring yourself back up to speed on the new task ("let's see, where was I?"). If you doubt this, try something that really demands your attention, say, proving a mathematical theorem or writing the introductory paragraph to your memo on restructuring the pricing of your newest product offering after market feedback in 5-minute intervals or while talking on the phone. Multitasking "works" only when the tasks are simple and short.

- Posted by Charles Broming
May 13, 2008 4:32 PM

In behaviour-based workshops one issue that comes up with the "S" style (inward-looking/people oriented) is the philosophy of "one thing at a time and that done well." That drives the outgoing styles (D & I) crazy since multi-tasking is their preferred approach. I think it was "Good to great" that documented the more sustainable success that was achieved by S-style leaders of corporations as against the dramatic, but unsustained gains of D-style leaders.
This is an important cause for reflection since I am located in the DI quadrants.

- Posted by Trevor Smith
May 13, 2008 4:38 PM

I enjoyed your post and thank you for sharing. I also feel that this article is a good accompaniment with yours.

The room is silent as you ready yourself. You plot out your battle strategy as you slowly and methodically place each piece of your armor in its proper place. You steady yourself under the weight, as you rise to face your skillful foe. You know every movement and every thought that they know, for you have battled this opponent day after day.

Your opponent has a name that you know oh so very well. That name is your name. That name is YOU!

There are plenty of challenges in our lives and some of them are of our own making. Ok, I’m being kind here. Most of them are of our own doing! We undermine ourselves, and make assumptions about what's possible, that restrict choices in our lives, and let our fears stop us from even trying to reach our goals and dreams. Like a pig that is unaware of the mud that he is wallowing in, being stuck in old ways of thinking keeps us blind to the many opportunities that surround us outside of that mud hole.

How can we get unstuck? How do we get ourselves out of the mud we so readily find ourselves playing in? It won’t occur by thinking and doing things the same old way, but, by shedding the negative thoughts and self-defeating actions that we have found to be so predisposed to in times of difficulty.

Every day of our lives we have thousands of thoughts that race through our heads; some positive and some negative. Most of us carry over many of these thoughts into the next day. For some, there is a tendency to dwell on the past and over-analyze what we could or should have done. “Analysis equals paralysis” as the old saying goes. If those thoughts are not supporting you, you will no doubt have trouble getting the results you want and overcoming the challenges along the way. Being able to manage your thoughts is at least 80 percent of the battle in being successful.

The very first thing that we need to accomplish when we are ready to change and move out of our own way, is to recognize that we are the ones blocking the doorway.
The following is a list of ten Forms of Paralyzing Thinking. It’s these thinking patterns that perpetuate the obstacles of getting in our own way! Most of us live with these thoughts day in and day out, playing out over and over again like a broken record. As stated above, it is essential to recognize these unconscious patterns of negative thinking. For some, we have developed ways to influence our thoughts and act on them with positive results.

Discover which of the following forms of paralyzing thinking infuses your mind and robs your motivation to get out of your own way. Just becoming aware of these thoughts, and observing them, will weaken and starve their grip, as you begin to uncoil these negative thought patterns.

1. All-Or-Nothing Thinking
You see things in black-or-white categories. Anything short of perfection is seen as a total failure in your eyes. You make one mistake and it becomes a deal breaker! You have a slice of pizza, and think “I’ve blown my whole diet” and then polish off the entire pie. When this plus or minus type of analysis occurs, it’s usually because of all-or-nothing thinking.

2. Overgeneralization
You know this is happening when words like “always” or “never” enter your thoughts. You see a single negative event as a never-ending pattern of defeat. A sales person hears “no” from a prospect, and thinks, “I’ll never get a sale.” You look at situations as “Universal Facts”. “Everybody knows this is the best sales strategy”. These overgeneralizations blind you from seeing new, different, or even better possibilities.

3. Mental Filter
You pick out a single negative detail and dwell and analyze on it exclusively. As a result, your vision of reality becomes gloomy, like a clear day turning cloudy. For example, you receive many positive comments about a sales or marketing presentation you made, but one person says something a bit critical. You obsess about his reaction for days, and ignore all the positive feedback that you did receive. You attend a sales meeting and focus on what is wrong with the meetings facilitation, missing the positive aspects of the meeting.

4. Discounting the Positive
You discount positive experiences by saying they “don’t count”. You do a good job and minimize it by thinking you could have done better, or that anyone could have done as well as you did. This extracts the pleasure out of life, and makes you feel inadequate and devalued.

5. Jumping to Conclusions
You interpret things negatively when there are no facts to support your conclusion. There are two forms of jumping to conclusions: (A) Mind reading: without checking it out, you arbitrarily conclude that someone is reacting negatively to you. (B) Fortune-telling: you predict things will turn out badly. For example, before a presentation, you think “I know I’m going to freeze up and forget what I was saying”, or “They’re going to hate my speech.”

6. Magnification
You exaggerate the significance of your problems and shortcomings and you minimize the value of your desirable qualities. One time after a seminar, I Brad, was working with a participant regarding his fear of presenting to his co-workers. I asked him to shut his eyes and imagine himself doing a presentation to his co-workers. I could visibly observe that he was anxious, so I asked him what thoughts were going through his mind. He replied, “Every single one of my co-workers is thinking, I don’t know what I’m talking about”. Every one of them, I asked? This was a classic case of magnification.

7. Emotional Reasoning
You assume your emotions reflect the way things really are. “I feel uncomfortable asking for a raise, so it must be an inappropriate thing to do”. Or, “I feel a deep sense of inadequacy and if they want excellent service they should go to my competitor”. Our emotions are like the weather. They can change day to day and moment to moment for a variety of different reasons. Our emotions are valuable, because they point to our perceptions of ourselves and the world around us. To equal measure, they are often not reflective of what’s really going on. So, we need to be careful about how we respond to our emotions by examining the evidence with our intellect.

8. “Should” Statements
You tell yourself that things should be the way you hoped for, or expected them to be. “Musts,” “ought tos” and “have tos” are similar offenders. These statements reflect rules that we have adopted either explicitly or implicitly. When these statements are directed against our selves, they lead to guilt, frustration and storytelling. When directed toward others, they often lead to anger, frustration and jealousy. They rarely put you in a practical position to change behavior. Instead, they will often make you feel either rebellious (and give you the urge to do the opposite) or hopeless (and make you want to do nothing).

9. Labeling
This is an extreme form of all-or-nothing thinking. Instead of saying, “I made a mistake,” you attach a negative label to yourself: “I’m a loser”. You might also label yourself “a fool” or “a jerk”. This labeling is totally irrational because what we do is not who we are. These labels are useless thoughts that lead to anger, anxiety, frustration and low self-esteem.

10. Personalization and Blame
Personalization occurs when you hold yourself personally responsible for an event that is not entirely under your control. A classic example is the person who regularly takes the blame for other’s unhappiness or anger. Although we may be able to influence other people’s feelings, we certainly are not responsible for them. We can only keep our side of the street clean, not theirs. Another example is when a mother finds out her child is having difficulties in school and thinks, “This shows what kind of mother I am”. Personalization leads to guilt and feelings of inadequacy.

Some people do just the opposite. They blame other people or their circumstances for their problems, and they overlook ways that they may be contributing to the problems in the first place. “The reason I have such difficulty at work is because I have an unreasonable boss”. Blame doesn’t work because other people will resent being the scapegoat, and will toss the blame right back in your court. It’s like a game of hot potato. No one wants to get stuck with it.

Becoming aware of these types of thinking is the first step to creating change. Once you’re aware, you can begin to “shift” your thinking and engage more rational responses to the events you encounter. Then, as you condition this new way of thinking, you’ll notice a significant improvement in how you feel about and respond to these types of triggering events.
There is a wonderful and effective strategy to assist in overcoming these 10 forms of paralyzing thought patterns. However, it is too extensive to write about in this e-newsletter .

Trans-World Dynamics
Bob and Brad

- Posted by Brad Stevenson
May 13, 2008 5:06 PM

Hoorah! For years I have read employment advertisements looking for people who are good at multitasking. I have always held that no one really is, and that skills in multitasking are an illusion. Thanks for speaking out on this.

- Posted by Deborah Coleman
May 16, 2008 9:25 AM

It's been fun reading these comments -- don't you feel for the frustration of people who know when they get to work in the morning that completing what they have in front of them is a near impossibility? Your comments drew me back to the early work of Jay Galbraith who in the early 70's wrote a great book called Designing complex organizations. In it, he argues that faced with too many information demands, an organization has a limited number of responses: Codify the demands so that they become simpler, incrase the information resources, or decrease performance. Those truths hold still today.

So don't be afraid to take a proverbial meat-axe to that long 'to do' list. Define what success would look like just for that day, and don't confuse the urgent with the important. Keep the thoughts coming!

Rita

- Posted by Rita McGrath
May 16, 2008 6:02 PM

Rita I love you!
Finaly I have something to show my ex-girlfriend that may go someway to explaining why multi tasking may not always be such a great way of working and why the stress of trying to do so many things actually split us up.
For the last seven years I have been involved in three property projects in which I was a carpenter, electrician, plumber, central heating engineer, roofer, painter & decorator, interior decorator and project manager. I also designed all the graphics and took all the photo's for our website (nothing to do with property - flower related).
I am the MD of three companies and about to start another website about Grand Prix racing which is my passion second to sculpture.

- Posted by Anthony
June 11, 2008 6:35 AM

This is so very prevelant throughout society today. For some reason we want to do "everything" and the more we want to do, the less we ultimately deliver.

This article really hits home as our organization is plagued by this problem. Too many projects, too much carryovers, and the overall inability to deliver.

We have begun to reign in the funding in an attempt to allow departments to "catch up" on their outstanding projects and try and gain more control of the process itself.

Dave

- Posted by Dave H.
June 20, 2008 1:14 PM

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1152

No trackbacks have been made to this entry.

Return to Rita McGrath

Join The Discussion

* Required Fields




Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Return to Rita McGrath


Posting Guidelines

We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.

We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.

  1. No selling of products or services. Let's keep this an ad-free zone.
  2. No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them.
  3. No multimedia. If you want us to know about outside sources, please point to them, Don't paste them in.
We look forward to including your voices on the site - and learning from you in the process.

The editors



About this Author

Rita McGrathColumbia Business School professor Rita McGrath studies innovation, corporate venturing, and entrepreneurship. She is well known for developing practical tools and frameworks to make the innovation process less risky and difficult, and to bring a dose of reality to growth programs. She works extensively with leadership teams in Global 1,000 companies. McGrath has co-authored six Harvard Business Review articles and two books: The Entrepreneurial Mindset (2000) and MarketBusters: 40 Strategic Moves that Drive Exceptional Business Growth (2005). .