You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Home | Sign In | Contact Us | Careers | Site Map | Help


Advertisement

The Business Opportunities in Mind Control

An extraordinary video making the rounds today shows a monkey manipulating a robot arm simply by thinking. The question is, what’s the killer app? It’s not going to be about making robots move.

Experiments like this one involving both people and animals have been going on for years. The basic idea is simple: Electrodes worn on the head or embedded in the brain pick up brain waves and transmit them to a computer that interprets them in order to control a machine. Human subjects have proven able at using thoughts to control robot hands and move a cursor on a monitor, manipulate objects in virtual worlds, and even pilot boats.

Most popular articles on the subject (and there are lots) fall back on the obvious: thought-control of machines will be really helpful to disabled people. As the New York Times blandly put it: “Scientists expect that technology will eventually allow people with spinal cord injuries and other paralyzing conditions to gain more control over their lives.” This is surely right – paralyzed people are already test-driving the technology. But this will be a side-show for what will become the dominant application: connecting our minds directly with our avatars. This technology will make The Matrix real.

Already, experimenters have used mind control to animate an avatar in second life by simply thinking “walk” to make it walk . That’s just the beginning. It takes little imagination to see how this technology could allow you to make your avatar act according to your every thought, conscious or not -- smiling, winking, walking, talking, even crying, a perfect facsimile of your real-world self. You raise an eyebrow, so does your avatar. San Francisco-based Emotiv Systems has already demoed technology that gets part of the way there . Writing in The 2008 HBR List of Breakthrough Ideas, the MIT Media Lab’s Judith Donath explored the implications for virtual self-revelation – and deception – that such technology will permit. Couple this capability with the reverse flow of data – sights, sounds, touch -- from your avatar directly back to your brain, and you’re Keanu Reeves’ Neo following the white rabbit. Far fetched? Not really. Already, blind subjects have been given rudimentary vision through electrodes implanted in their brains. Deaf people have “hearing” provided by electrodes placed in their cochleas. The fundamental technology for pushing computerized sensory information into our brains exists.

This world may be decades off, but it’s inevitable -- and the business opportunities are mind boggling.

Comments

The article posted by Gardiner Morse concludes that the computerized sensory information into our brains exists and that business oppurtunities are immense in this field. The author's line of reasoning is that this technology shall help people with disabilities. The argument is unconvincing for several reasons and has several flaws.
First and foremost, the author makes a optimististic assumption that the said technology shall be help to people with disabilities. However the author fails to convince whether the government of several nations shall fund and legally permit such technological development. For example, the cloning of Human Beings,which again is super advancement in medical science, is banned in many nations.
Secondly, the author makes a sweeping generalisation that this technology shall bring good in the lives of people. This is not true. This technology is far from its true realisation. Many human lives will be subjected to experimentation.

The author must support his article by demonstrating how exactly the technology shall help the Human Race as such. Some examples may be quoted to prove the argument.

- Posted by Nalin Chakoo
June 2, 2008 1:24 AM

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1283

No trackbacks have been made to this entry.

Return to HBR Editors' Blog

Join The Discussion

* Required Fields




Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Return to HBR Editors' Blog


Posting Guidelines

We hope the conversations that take place on Harvard Business Online will be energetic, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors for clarity, length, and relevance. As such, posts will not appear immediately, although we will work hard to publish them as quickly as possible. We expect to publish nearly all of the posts you contribute.

To make this happen, please adhere to the following guidelines.

  1. No selling of products or services. Let's keep this an ad-free zone.
  2. No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them.
  3. No multimedia. If you want us to know about outside sources, please point to them, Don't paste them in.
We look forward to including your voices on the site - and learning from you.

The editors



Stay Connected

RSS Feeds
Email Newsletters
Twitter: @HarvardBiz
YouTube
Podcasts on iTunes
Harvard Business Mobile

About this Blog

HBR Editors' BlogA regular dispatch from the front lines of management by the editorial team at the Harvard Business Review.

Contributors include:

Sarah Cliffe
Diane Coutu
Bronwyn Fryer
Paul Hemp
Julia Kirby
Lew McCreary
Steve Prokesch