You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Home | Sign In | Contact Us | Careers | Site Map | Help


Advertisement

The Cruelest Month for Airlines

I once saw a quote attributed to Mark Twain (inaccurately, I believe) that went something like this: “Publishers are like the weather. They exist so that people can have something about which to agree to complain.” If publishers ever served that purpose, surely they have been replaced by airlines. They are the universal subject of conversation, more inclusive than sports or movies, less likely to ruin friendships than politics, and less likely to interest HR than sex. Plus, we all have horror stories.

In this respect, April has been the cruelest month. Well, March and April, since Southwest started grounding flights (botched inspections) March 12, British Airways opened (if that is the word) Terminal 5 at Heathrow March 27 (lost luggage, lost staff), and American cancelled its workhorse MD-80 flights for several days starting April 8 (botched inspections). All in all, a great month for Amtrak.

Lord knows I fly enough to know that there’s inherent stochastic hurly-burly (b-school speak for “shit happens”) in air travel. But I never cease to be amazed by the airlines’ surreal attitude toward customer service. On American Airlines’s home page on April 11, the high-water-mark of chaos, the “advisory” at the top connected to a perfectly fine apology; and a day or two later, as normality returned, frequent flyers such as I got an apologetic e-mail. But when the front page of every newspaper in the U.S. shows your passengers stranded and pitiable, surely “FAA Inspections [i.e., not our fault] affect [totally halt] some [as much as 40%] AA travel” is a sentence that should go down in the annals of understatement. And surely the apology should have been on the landing page, not a click in.

British Airways did better, a little. Go there and a pop-up apology greets you. Currently it reads “Since opening London Heathrow's Terminal 5 on March 27, 2008, we have experienced some operational difficulties and we accept that we have not provided the level of service our customers expect.” It was more (and more appropriately) groveling earlier. Click past the “oops,” though, and you’re in an Orwellian opium dream: “At London Heathrow Terminal 5 we’ve created a natural, logical journey that’s so calm, you’ll flow through. It shouldn’t take long to get from Check-in to Departures. Transferring and arriving are just as simple and calm. Spend the time you save enjoying the excellent range of shops, cafes and restaurants. Or simply relax and be wowed by the world class architecture.” You’ll be so tranked out you’ll forget to worry about your bags.

As I said, I get it that things go wrong. Badly wrong. All the time. I get it that security is a pain, profits are nonexistent, systems are complex, fixes take time. I’m not stupid. So why do airlines behave as if they think I am?

Comments

The commercial airline industry behaves like a communist monopoly. I fly usair, continental, AA, United and all are in the dumps in terms of customer service, connectivity, cancelled flights and most importantly how they treat their customers. Ask for a can of soda and they give you the looks!! You fly business class and you get a soda and a small bag of pretzels all of that for as little as $900 to $1,200 dlls what a bargain!!

The federal government has failed so miserably by not passing laws or penalties for the mistreatment of flying passengers. The worst practice of the industry is to load passengers to free gates for the next plane and keep all passengers for hours in a small hot, hard to breathe cabin always telling you "in a few more minutes we will be moving"

Complain inside the plane and you run the risk of being tagged and escorted out of the plane at arrival for likely terrorist association or dangerous disruptive behavior.

I fly about 100,000 miles internationally and it is noticeable how the quality, mood and temper of the crew changes when you board an american based airliner. The crew is most often than not in bad mood, they do not like it when you say thanks, they lose temper with passengers, you better do not touch that "call" button in your seat unless you are ready for the "looks" and "dont you see I am busy?"

Once you experiences other airlines (Mexicana, Singapore airlines, cathay, Korean air, Lufthansa and others) you immediately see the difference in all aspects of flying (of course secutiry is still very much the same everywhere).

A few years ago Dr Minztberg published a short book on his experiences about flying American airline companies. People should read it again and see that all he wrote about still is the same and getting worse and worse. Will we be chained to our seats next? like in the antique Roman ships where rowers could not move from their seats, nor say anything, no bathroom breaks and row, row and row?

When will someone with real power and influence get the airline industry in line?

- Posted by Jesus Ponce de Leon
April 29, 2008 8:11 PM

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1105

No trackbacks have been made to this entry.

Return to HBR Editors' Blog

Join The Discussion

* Required Fields




Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Return to HBR Editors' Blog


Posting Guidelines

We hope the conversations that take place on Harvard Business Online will be energetic, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors for clarity, length, and relevance. As such, posts will not appear immediately, although we will work hard to publish them as quickly as possible. We expect to publish nearly all of the posts you contribute.

To make this happen, please adhere to the following guidelines.

  1. No selling of products or services. Let's keep this an ad-free zone.
  2. No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them.
  3. No multimedia. If you want us to know about outside sources, please point to them, Don't paste them in.
We look forward to including your voices on the site - and learning from you.

The editors




About this Blog

HBR Editors' BlogA regular dispatch from the front lines of management by the editorial team at the Harvard Business Review.

Contributors include:

Sarah Cliffe
Diane Coutu
Bronwyn Fryer
Paul Hemp
Julia Kirby
Lew McCreary
Steve Prokesch