Voices » HBR Voices » Rita McGrath » Expose Your Company's Blind Spots
RSS Feed
3:30 PM Monday March 31, 2008
Is your company unintentionally keeping your most senior people from getting the feedback they most need? It can easily happen as an unintended consequence of success. Consider these situations:
Senior executives at car companies drive only the newest models: For decades, the top executives at America's leading automobile manufacturers always drove models fresh from the factory. Not only that, but these cars were washed, maintained, and looked after by in-company employees. They never experienced quality breakdowns as the cars aged, rust problems, or issues with scheduling service calls at a snarly auto shop. Imagine their surprise at hearing people complain about problems that they don't even know or think about!
Technology handouts: One of my telecommunications manufacturing clients used to routinely give the latest handsets and toys to its key executives, just before or along with commercial launch of the offers. As a result, these folks never had to go into a phone store, never had to deal with inefficient or even hostile distributors, and never had to compare their offerings with competing products. They only compared their own products to previous versions of their own products. It was only when the company radically changed this policy and forced its folks to go directly through the same channels customers had to use that they realized that their once-unassailable advantages with customers were starting to erode. This in turn prompted significant strategic changes, including relocating major operational centers to different markets and shifting the way customer segmentation was done - all stemming from the insights of direct experience.
The executives can hear, even if you can't: One of our clients, a mobile telecommunications operator, routinely had its operations staff make sure that the cellular signals in the headquarters office, main travel routes and residential areas inhabited by senior executives were strong, reliable and consistent. Imagine the surprise these executives felt when friends and relations expressed their infuriation with spotty coverage, dropped calls or weak signals -- after all, this never happened to them! Even more astonishingly, the senior people didn't know that they were experiencing the modern-day equivalent of a "Potemkin Village" - they thought their services were far better than consumers did. This in turn led them to dismiss quality, coverage and service level data that reflected how infuriated consumers were as 'inaccurate'.
The message? Sometimes, buffering senior people from exposure to ordinary experiences unintentionally gives them a false sense of security with respect to the quality, reliability or convenience of your offerings. This in turn can breed dangerous complacency and a lack of urgency with respect to underlying problems. In best-practice companies, in contrast, there are mechanisms to make sure that direct contact with customers is a part of every executives' normal job.
A better approach. At Amazon.com executives routinely spend time on the phones with customers. At Ikea, a few times a year executives and line-level staff work together in what they call "anti-bureaucracy days." At Continental and Southwest airlines, it would not be unusual for executives to spend time at the ticket counter or handling baggage. Proctor and Gamble executives spend a lot of time following consumers around, watching how they do things, and looking for unmet needs. In a great recent story, Irene Rosenfeld, the CEO of Kraft Foods, was flabbergasted to be offered a drink made of their orange flavored mix, Tang, only to learn (to her discomfort) that in China it is served hot, like tea!
Time spent with customers in real-life situations can give you insight into your own offerings, competitive offerings and the changing marketplace in which you compete. Time buffered from reality can create dangerous blind spots.
Stay up to date on the latest HBR articles, podcasts, blogs, and more. Sign up for the HBR Email Newsletter today.
Never miss a new post from your favorite blogger again with the HarvardBusiness.org Daily Alert email. The Alert delivers the latest blog posts from HarvardBusiness.org and HBR.org directly to your inbox every morning at 8:00 AM ET.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1126
No trackbacks have been made to this entry.
Posting Guidelines
We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.
We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.
Columbia Business School professor Rita McGrath studies innovation, corporate venturing, and entrepreneurship. She is well known for developing practical tools and frameworks to make the innovation process less risky and difficult, and to bring a dose of reality to growth programs. She works extensively with leadership teams in Global 1,000 companies. McGrath has co-authored six Harvard Business Review articles and two books: The Entrepreneurial Mindset (2000), MarketBusters: 40 Strategic Moves that Drive Exceptional Business Growth (2005), and Discovery Driven Growth (2009).
ADVERTISEMENT
If you can't read a balance sheet, you'd better read this. This specially priced set gives managers mastery of the financial basics they need to plan, budget, forecast, and control resources with confidence.
This specially priced set will show you how to plan and execute a course of action that will carry you and your employees through the current economic upheaval and help everyone maximize their performance.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments
Dear Mam,
It’s an interesting read.
It’s a truth experienced by many organizations (especially, the big ones), but rarely do they accept / acknowledge and more so, take measures to overcome the situation.
Having said this…. I would like to draw a similar chord in organizations’ internal operations too. Many a cases, this “Potemkin Village” phenomenon is not just limited to customer services and products offerings. One bright example could be the human resource / relationship aspects. Though there might be clear dashboard indicators like remuneration, attrition rate etc, with more and more right brain indicators playing a dominant role in human re-sourcing and relationship management , this “buffering” phenomenon has become more common place and damaging.
It’s not only the departments like human resources, but the senior management who should aggressively get involved to break this buffer shield created, and get into the act getting the actual ‘feel’ of the ground realities. This definitely to make the organization more equipped culturally and procedurally (whistle blowers, informal and involved engagements etc) as well, to overcome the situation.
Thank you.
Warm Regards,
Souparno Bagchi.
- Posted by Souparno Bagchi
July 4, 2008 7:30 AM
its true
- Posted by zanchuk
July 5, 2008 1:57 AM
Even companies that seemingly have a more open construct are often times simply practicing the same blind loyalty as those that insulate themselves from the reality of the marketplace by using the newest and the best of products offered to the public.
I worked in such an organization where annually senior management took to the field working positions and interacting with customers at the user level and this too was all contrived, a complete set-up on the past of subordinate management. This became a laughable game we all enjoyed at the mid management level but never took seriously. The very next day it was business as usual.
One thing I have learned is successful practices of any kind are not done as a “campaign” to impress, but incorporated into the very practice of the business. Older more established companies are simply too steeped in past practices and history to do things differently unless competition in the marketplace changes the way they operate.
- Posted by Mark Frank
July 5, 2008 11:43 AM
Makes perfect sense. I am struggling with building a case for executives to actually talk to customers to understand the problems we seek to solve. Only this week, our CEO said "we don't have time for that, we need to launch this product ASAP". if we never talked to customers, how we do even know they have that problem and how much they value a solution?
I am sure she is not the only one in the world. Any practical advice that I could use is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Bob
- Posted by Bob Stokes
July 5, 2008 3:23 PM
Rita,
These are great comments about the distance between an organizations currrent customers and the CEO of the organization and how to close the gap. What I have seen is a spike in surveying by organizations customers to understand their satisfaction without a real linkage to what the customer actually wants in terms of their service. How often are these surveys written a smoky room, by the people who think they know what the customer wants? I can quote many examples where this holds to be true. A survey will only get you so far. But that belaboard you point.
The other thing about the examples from Amazon that is different from a CEO walk around day, is that they are being put on the front line with the customer. Here is an even more agressive model The startup wesabe.com (http://www.wesabe.com/page/talk) has their CEO available at a designated time. Talk about true capture of the Voice of the Customer. How many organizations could chose to do this and don't?
- Posted by Sam
December 19, 2008 12:17 PM
Have just now gone back to revisit this blog, and I want to thank all of your for the great comments. I'll put up a new post to address the question of how you get senior people to pay attention to customers more directly.
Thanks for the great thoughts!
- Posted by Rita McGrath
February 8, 2009 9:01 AM