Voices » HBR Voices » Susan Cramm » IT Project Funding: Less Is More
RSS Feed
10:18 AM Thursday October 30, 2008
Good news! Your project was approved.
Even better! Your funding was cut!
When it comes to IT project funding, less is often more.
Too much money results in lengthy, bloated projects. While, overall, only 1/3 of IT-enabled business initiatives deliver as planned, project success declines dramatically as project size increases.
Of course, big dollars are required to fix big problems. But the way to solve a big problem is to make it a series of small problems..
Smart companies break up big projects into stages, with each stage delivering value within a 3-6 month time frame. By using time as an input, rather than an output, teams are forced to focus on what's practical rather than what's possible. They're forced to target current needs and leverage existing knowledge about business processes, information and technologies.
Contrast this with the more typical "boil the ocean" approach. In the futile attempt to define the long-term solution to big problems, teams mill around smartly, trying to know the unknowable, drafting requirements, and evaluating technology options for architectures that don't yet exist.In the process, time and money is wasted producing paper rather than performing experiments.
If the U.S. pioneers used this approach, most of the U.S. population would still be living in and around Boston.
Given that only about 20% of applications functionality is typically used (and which 20% is unpredictable), it's impossible to figure it all out in advance. The key to bringing the future forward is getting tools in the hands of the users as quickly as possible. If they use them, you are on the right track. If they don't, find out why and give it another go.
This stumbling and bumbling, learn-by-doing approach may seem a little chaotic, but it's reflective of how organizations, and people, change and grow. Mistakes will be made, but it's better to make a series of small mistakes and mid-course corrections, than it is to make one huge, multi-million dollar mistake from which there is no way to recover.
There is a downside to fast-cycle delivery. It's harder to deliver the right thing fast than it is to deliver the wrong thing slow. In order to get the most from limiting funding, ensure the following is in place:
Antoine de Saint-Exupery said, "You know you've achieved perfection in design, not when you have nothing more to add, but when you have nothing more to take away." Challenge your organization to make more out of less by committing to faster, more disciplined delivery.
To learn more, check out this informative, and enjoyable, article outlining the lessons learned from the biggest technical disasters.
And while you're at it, in the spirit of Halloween, take a moment to share some of your own technology horror stories.
Stay up to date on the latest HBR articles, podcasts, blogs, and more. Sign up for the HBR Email Newsletter today.
Never miss a new post from your favorite blogger again with the HarvardBusiness.org Daily Alert email. The Alert delivers the latest blog posts from HarvardBusiness.org and HBR.org directly to your inbox every morning at 8:00 AM ET.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3115
No trackbacks have been made to this entry.
Posting Guidelines
We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.
We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.
Susan Cramm is the founder and president of Valuedance and a recognized industry expert on information technology leadership and coaching. She is the former CFO and executive vice president at Chevy’s Mexican Restaurants. Prior to Chevy’s, Cramm worked with the Taco Bell Corporation and held the positions of CIO and vice president of the Information Technology Group and Senior Director for Financial and Strategic Planning.
ADVERTISEMENT
If you can't read a balance sheet, you'd better read this. This specially priced set gives managers mastery of the financial basics they need to plan, budget, forecast, and control resources with confidence.
This specially priced set will show you how to plan and execute a course of action that will carry you and your employees through the current economic upheaval and help everyone maximize their performance.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments
Hi Susan,
It's what lies ahead of us that I'm worried about.
The “Tax Research UK” blog recently posted that “About 3% of the cash in the UK economy is actually issued by the Bank of England. The rest is electronic money.”
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/10/20/network-banking-a-radical-solution-for-the-uks-banking-crisis/
Billions, if not trillions of electronic “currency” flow around the globe every week.
Financial institutions today are really “data (money) refineries”, processing and optimising these flows. But unlike the refineries of the Oil & Gas world they are not subject to the same level of heavy regulation when it comes to how the assets are put together, which means it is only a matter of time before there is a major disaster involving a bank.
Despite performing highly dangerous operations 24/7, Oil & Gas
refineries rarely suffer catastrophic accidents. This is because they are legally required to accurately document and understand how the assets of the business interact to enable the flow of product through the assets of the plant.
There is no such requirement in the financial world, or indeed in most sectors of the economy, despite our routine reliance on IT and flows of data between business assets to perform business tasks (”business assets” includes people).
As complexity has built up over time, with systems and technology being piled on top of other systems and technology, the need to understand vulnerabilities is becoming ever more acute. A failure may not cause a physical explosion but it could certainly cause an economic one.
During the past couple of decades there have been many mergers in the global banking industry. There is at least one major European bank that, after many years, still has not been able to successfully consolidate the systems from the original separate businesses.
This past week the world has watched Alan Greenspan testifying before the U.S Congress about where the financial industry went wrong (basically, people didn’t understand risk, or if they did they kept quiet). I hope IT doesn’t get to the stage where similar hearings are being held and IT leaders are ‘in the dock’.
The disaster is coming, let’s hope the world economy is in much better shape before it hits.
regards
PJW
- Posted by Paul Wallis
October 30, 2008 12:56 PM
Hi Susan,
I think you're describing Agile in some aspects of your post (such as "Small, experienced team", "Smart companies break up big projects into stages") without really saying it.
"By using time as an input, rather than an output", is an excellent way of describing the current state of most (large) IT Projects. I think, as you described, this leads to a huge failure rate in IT Projects (failure, of course is a subjective term ).
The reasons of IT project failures are many, and I have published several months ago an article called failure causes in IT project management listing failure reasons by maturity level.
- Posted by PM Hut
October 31, 2008 12:17 AM
Susan -
Thanks a lot for the great post.
While jumping on the next IT project always
have the following question in mind and on
the table:
"What is the business problem we want to tackle?
What could other ways to get to the same result?"
You might wonder how many good and cost-efficient
ways there are - just like on a journey.
Best regards
Ralf
PS.: Forgot to mention that MENTAL MODELS are likely
to be the roadblocks to change in thinking.
- Posted by Ralf Lippold
November 2, 2008 11:50 AM
Hi,
I have been seconded to started a project. I have started training people from rural areas and finished training training about 800. Still I have more than 8000 people still interested to do the course. Now I am told there are no more funds to continue with the Project.
How can you help me interms of getting funding to rescure the situation.
Thanks
Constance
- Posted by Constance Mbhele
June 9, 2009 11:47 AM