The Boomers' Different Approach to Retirement
I have a fair number of circular discussions with people these days.
Study after study has concluded that Boomers don’t have enough money saved for retirement, particularly given the long lives that most will lead. So, I get asked repeatedly, “Don’t Boomers have to work?”
Well, in fact most want to work.
“But, really, don’t they have to work?”
Yes, I guess so. But I’m not sure it’s a relevant question. Somehow it feels a little bit like reminding people that sex is essential for procreation. I don’t think that is the major factor affecting most people’s practices.
The McKinsey Institute just issued an analysis of Boomers’ savings. The release says, “The net effect is that boomers carry far more debt than other generations. Because of inadequate saving, two-thirds of baby boomers are unprepared for retirement, defined as able to sustain 80% of their spending as they age. The solution is to work longer. If the median age of retirement were to rise two years, from 62.6 today to 64.1 in 2015, the number of 'unprepared' households would be cut in half.”
I generally love McKinsey’s research and it’s always good to document the specifics of a situation. But really, this is hardly news.
Is it helpful to focus on people need to do something that they want to do regardless? As early as 2004, in our research, 34% of the entire workforce answered that question “never!” The percentages have increased over time, and with age.
In a study funded by HSBC, money was one of five nearly equally rated reasons that people in more than a dozen countries gave for wanting to continue working. The other reasons were to keep mentally stimulated, keep physically active, connect with others, and have something meaningful and valuable to do with your time.
A study funded by Merrill Lynch found that 71 percent of adults plan to work in some capacity post-age 65. Almost half of all those adults never plan to stop working completely. Among those who expect to work in retirement and eventually stop, the average anticipated tenure of their "retirement career" will be over nine years and the average age at which they will stop working completely is over 70.
Yes, people certainly want to work in different ways – with more flexibility and control. Most do not want to work as hard or as long as they are in their 50’s for another thirty years. But most want to work. My latest book, Retire Retirement: Career Strategies for the Boomer Generation, is, as I like to say, my love letter to those of you who are planning for that transition. I hope you find it helpful and encouraging.
So, no argument that most Boomers will need some extra income to match their long life expectancies. Happily, for most, that should not be an issue. For once, wants and needs align.
What are your plans? Have you begun planning for a second career?
Sign up for the Harvard Business Publishing Weekly Hotlist, a new weekly email roundup featuring the top highlights from HarvardBusiness.org.
- Comments (3)
- Join the Discussion
- Email/Share

Tamara J. Erickson is both a McKinsey Award-winning author and popular and engaging storyteller. Her compelling views of the future are based on extensive research on changing demographics and employee values and, most recently, on how successful organizations work. 

Comments
Agreed, no plans to retire, but with lots of plans about how to say healthy and actice so as not to be forced into retirement.
I have actually started my second career now at age 51, moving from working for companies to being a consultant. My third career would be writing about my profession, see http://stores.lulu.com/dwwright99
The sea change between boomers like me and the greatest generation, like my father, is that work is no longer accepted to be toil that must be survived to get to those golden years. If we hate what we do, we change to something else. My dad retired 'early' at 63 but was dead at 66 thanks to the tobacco industry. I just wish he had had a job that really engaged him during his whole working life, not just a 8 hour shift.
- Posted by David Wright
June 12, 2008 11:32 AM
You ask the right question. After coaching leaders for over a decade, I am no longer surprised by the disconnect between goals and actions.
People want to work into and past retirement years, but they want more autonomy and part-time work. Alas, but when asked what they are doing about it - the response is vague. Most haven't actively managed their careers and have few skills to do so.
Drucker had it right when he said that if you aren't working on your 2nd career in your 40's, you aren't going to have one.
Susan Cramm
susan@valuedance.com
- Posted by Susan Cramm
June 17, 2008 10:43 PM
Tammy, I'm just getting familiar with your blog...and have it RSS'd...
I just turned 60...took early retirement at the end of '06 from a large telecom company where I spent 21 years. Subsequent to doing some networking, I just completed a one-year contracting gig at a local company using my established HR experience and knowledge base. I'm resistant to returning to a full time corporate position...not that I've had anyone banging the door down looking for me. I'm very realistic about today's work world and today's economy...and I accept those parameters for someone like me. I'm ideally seeking independent contract/consulting work. In addition to needing a continued revenue stream, I don't envision myself "retiring"...that word is not in my vocabulary...and I dare to utter Bob Dylan's mantra at his 63 years, "I'm in my middle years and I don't have retirement plans".
This is just a new journey along which I will have to keep a much more open mind to many more new opportunities.
Regards,
Norm
- Posted by Norm Patry
July 15, 2008 5:12 PM