Gill Corkindale Letter from London RSS Feed

How to Get Happy: Tactics From the UK's Cheeriest Company

9:22 AM Friday August 15, 2008

Tags:Managing people, Organizational culture

If you're reading this column, I guess I've caught you at one of the best moments in your working year. The sun is shining, work is winding down for the summer and you're probably heading off for your annual holiday. You're ready to leave everything behind, to take some time out to reflect on your year to date. I'm lucky enough to be doing the same, from the cool hills above Portugal's windswept Algarve coast.

For many of us, this two-week summer vacation is an oasis in our working lives. Thoughts of the office, the credit crunch and global world disorder float away as we enjoy time with our family and friends, lazy walks to the beach or golf course and long, relaxing evenings. It's a brief window of happiness when life feels as it should - relaxed, full and happy. But it doesn't last long: in a blink, we'll be back at the office and back in the middle of all the problems, difficult people and tough decisions we briefly managed to escape.

But imagine what it would be like if you couldn't wait to get back to work, if you were actually reluctant to leave your job even for a short break because you enjoyed it so much. I'm sure there are some such lucky people out there, but what about the rest of us? Should we expect to be happy at work?

As a business coach, I've noticed that more and more managers and leaders are expecting to derive more happiness and satisfaction from their work. They are often young, talented and successful people who view their jobs as routes to self-actualisation. Yet this shift in the purpose of work raises many questions: how much satisfaction are we entitled to derive from work? And should employers be expected to provide meaning and happiness as well as a job and salary?

Far from being a pipe dream, companies are now beginning to take the concept of happiness at work very seriously, and for sound business reasons. A recent research paper by Alex Edmans, a finance professor at Wharton, found that US corporations with the happiest employees have a financial performance notably better than lower-ranked companies.

Felicia A. Huppert, professor of positive psychology at Cambridge university, says happiness has been scientifically proven to make us live longer and healthier and work more successfully. Happy folk use the left side of their brains more and have better immune systems. This has obvious implications for the creative thinking and innovation that is so valuable for business today. Moreover, as Edmans says, employee satisfaction is a very effective motivational tool and a powerful method of retaining key employees.

Google is one US company that repeatedly wins plaudits for being a great place to work. At the top of Fortune magazine's annual list of the "100 Best Companies to Work for in America," the company is well- known for caring about employees' welfare and its emphasis on corporate social responsibility.

Here in the UK, Happy, a small IT training company, is making its own waves. It has won numerous awards for being one of the most inspired places to work and for its its approach to employee and customer relations. Here are some of its guiding principles:

  • Create an environment where people feel good about themselves. Research has shown that managers spend three times as much time telling people what they did wrong as telling them what they did right. How often you can spot somebody doing something right?
  • Give people freedom. When did you personally work at your best? Probably when you were given freedom and trusted to do it your way. Is this what you provide for your people? Have they been challenged, trusted and given freedom?
  • Ensure your people are working within your organisation's principles and have clear targets. Make the framework crystal clear, then give people the freedom to work out their own way to achieve it - this will create opportunities for innovation.
  • Feedback is crucial to job ownership. Ensure that your people regularly receive feedback from their internal or external customers. And ownership reinforces both responsibility and innovation -- if people genuinely have full ownership, they will make sure it works.
  • Choose managers according to how good they are with people. Do you appoint managers on the basis of core skills or length of service, regardless of their ability to motivate, support, and develop staff?
  • Ensure managers know how they are doing with their staff. Do your managers regularly receive peer and upward appraisals?
  • Recruit for attitude, then train for skills. At the interview, do you test people on their ability to talk through their CV and their ability to do the tasks? What about whether they show positive attitude, how supportive they are to others, or their ability to cope with change?
  • Systems, not rules. Trust everyone to do their jobs to the best of their ability - with a clear set of principles and a framework, but without detailed rules and instructions. Have you ensured that a process or system can be changed if any member of staff can find a better way to meet the needs of customers?
  • Celebrate mistakes. Saying 'I got it wrong' is a sign of responsibility and an indication of an honest and open corporate culture. If people haven't made any mistakes, they probably haven't tried anything new. Does your culture ensure people remain open or does it stifle learning?

What do you think about Happy's principles? Does your company or organization operate on these or similar guidelines? Are they realistic for your organization? Would your company be a better place - for leaders, employees or customers - if it followed these principles? Do you have any further suggestions?

People who read this also read:

 
* * *
Sign up for the Weekly Hotlist, a weekly email roundup featuring the top posts from HarvardBusiness.org and HBR.org.

Never miss a new post from your favorite blogger again with the HarvardBusiness.org Daily Alert email. The Alert delivers the latest blog posts from HarvardBusiness.org and HBR.org directly to your inbox every morning at 8:00 AM ET.


Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2637

No trackbacks have been made to this entry.

Comments

We still seem to be treating happiness as "icing on a cake". An employer cannot give us happiness. Happiness comes from a profound sense of "owning" our life, and that includes our job.

By definition, any employer who tries to deliver happiness as a bold-on, will deny happiness because they deny the essential ingredient of happiness, ownership,

To have a happy workplace, rather than a bullying workplace where you are required to do irrelevant emotional labor of smiling at the boss to make him or her feel like s/he has delivered happiness, we have to genuinely base the business of the hopes, dreams, and purpose of our employeees. Such a workplace includes what you have on your list, but in and of themselves, they will do little if people cannot pursue a deeply held sense of purpose.

Happiness is more than skin deep. It is going to require a revolution in management thinking, employment law, and even institutions that Brits hold dear, like the NHS. Are we up to it?

- Posted by Jo 
August 16, 2008 8:08 AM

I had come across quite a few people who are happy in my organization and I think I can further bifurcate them into two categories:
A) People who are happy because they succeed in making their bosses happy each day. Eventually that becomes their "core competency" and they strive day in and day out just to impress their line managers because for them that means good feedback, good appraisal, pay hike, bonuses, incentives and perks! Work satisfaction doesn't matter to them. They are submissive, compliant and complacent. They take everything in their stride.

B) There are a second set of people who are happy because they truly enjoy the work they are doing. It doesn't matter which company they are working for or how much they are paying. They truly are passionate about what they are doing. They are not self-centric as category A people and work more efficiently in a team. They simply forge ahead and win and as a result remain happy.

Now I think the reason why Google has become "Michael Phelps" among the corporates is because it has recruited more number of category B people. Added to that, their work environment and task-oriented jobs (as opposed to time-oriented jobs) and friendly team leaders fueled and propelled their success rate.

I really love the fact that Happy's guiding principles center around freedom, attitude and managers being good people managers first. Creativity doesn't come out of the most employees because they have got no freedom and they are working with a sword hanging on the top of their head. They are too afraid to put a toe out of the line and think out of the box because their line managers haven't given that much freedom and privilege. Many people have got the top notch skills but not the right attitude towards work, which makes them whine more. And lastly it doesn't matter if the manager is an MBA out of an ivy league school, he has to be good with people, his most priced assets, and manage them better because they are the ones who will work on his decisions.

- Posted by Nikhil Yata 
August 18, 2008 1:14 PM

Thanks for pointing out the importance of corporate social responsibility in your article. Adaptable, humane and innovative approach concerning professionals will inevitably affect the larger society. Stay happy at work!

- Posted by Marisa 
August 18, 2008 1:35 PM

Gill, while I read with interest your 'Recommendations by Loomia', I begin to wonder if you truly are such a ' gentle and poetic soul', playing around with such vague and emptied of concrete contain
concepts as' being happy'. Did it never strike you that:"Life consists mainly of endless human psychosis, whose entire sum equals up to an ABSURD.", as K. Yaspers will tend to state? That from the moment of birth, when the stone age baby first confronts its 21'st century mother,this innocent human being is confronted with forces,mainly concerned with destroying it's potentials. Unfortunately this enterprise is on the whole successful. By the time the new human being is 15 or so, we are left with a being like ourselves, a half - crazed creature, more or less adjusted to a mad world. This is normality in our present age. Jo, in his comments tells you that 'happiness' can't be treated as"icing on a cake"; Happiness is more than skin deep. It "REQUIRES" a revolution in our management thinking, employment law and even institutions,like NHS, who use trivial proverbs as their label:'Tell me and I will forget; Show me and I will remember;Involve me and I will understand'!? At least to me it is obvious that without a radical change in our 'MINDSET' : developing the ability to 'Unlearn'
as well as flexible learning of new things is really needed, thinking out of the box,etc, we are going nowhere, just moving in vicious circles.To ignore the facts does not change the facts.
Being essentially such a fine, well bred and good intentioned person, definitely enjoying a high stand art of living and quality of work life, you are right in several points:"That love, not time, heals all wounds.";"You can always pray for someone when you don't have the strength to help him in some other way.";" That we should be glad God doesn't give us everything we ask for.";" That everyone wants to live on the top of the mountain, but all the 'happiness and growth' occurs while you are climbing it."
I would like to finish my rather ' heavy deep thoughts' with the story about the conversation between
the TWINS(2), in the womb of their mother: One of them was an optimist and was happy to that his limbs were growing without having the idea for what purpose and where he was heading for -"The Outward World"!!? ;The other was pessimistic, because he was able to realize that he was feeding himself from the rope that tied him to his mom (without knowing it was his mother's) and
was beginning to worry what will eventually happen if the 'FOOD', that was diminishing ended?
He was afraid that he and his twin will starve! Both didn't know or had the slightest idea of what
was to ahead! So the lesson is that "Mother Nature" , seems to know - what we may never learn.
Take it easy! Even if we pass away, something inevitable, we may well end up in a better world, that may have nothing to do with the one we are part of. One thing is for sure that even in the
completely 'UNKNOWN', there are going to be 'Management GURUS ',that will readily explain to
us what we should be doing!

- Posted by Michael Yanakiev 
August 25, 2008 10:17 AM

Great article. Great responses. I believe that people-friendly, competent managers, who are also great leaders contribute to the overall "happiness" of an organization.

- Posted by Tracey 
August 25, 2008 11:48 AM

I really agree with the importance of having an environment where people are allowed to make mistakes. For me that is when the best learning occurs. The role of the manager is critical for this to work as they have to provide ongoing coaching and support. In addition the leaders of the organisation need to set the example and learn from mistakes themselves - something that is rare in most organisations.

Chris
http://learn2develop.blogspot.com

- Posted by Chris 
August 27, 2008 12:34 PM

Nikhil: Thanks so much for your insights into the two types of people who are happy in your company – fascinating, and I have seen this pattern myself over the years. Those who manage upwards, investing in their careers and promotions and those who just love their work. You are right, too, that Google, has spotted this and does all it can to attract people who enjoy their work.

Freedom is indeed a powerful motivator – it was Thucydides, the 5th century BC war historian who is credited with saying: “The secret to happiness is freedom”.

Finally, as you say, being a good manager, as Happy shows, is a combination of the right attitude to work, giving people freedom and supporting others – not just a top MBA.

Jo: Having hopes, dreams and purpose surely do lead to happiness – but can we expect to get them from work?

Michael: What are your suggestions for a revolution in management thinking? This sounds exciting!

Marisa and Tracey: Thanks for your comment – yes let’s stay happy at work!

Chris: you're right, leaders also need to show that they are learning/have learned from mistakes - but there are so few examples of leaders doing this today. An interesting idea for another post!

- Posted by Gill Corkindale 
August 28, 2008 4:23 PM

When doing research for my book, SHIFT to Professional Paradise, I found that work beliefs are a core foundational element for finding the "paradise mindset" aka "happiness" at work. We are all inundated with messages about work from our families, our schooling, friends, personal experiences, etc. These beliefs form the basis for our mindset about work, which drives our actions and ultimately our outcomes on any given day. (For more on my research, visit www.ProfessionalParadise.com and go to Free Paradise Tools for a Belief Brief white paper)

I've think that a lot of folks in the workplace are waiting for their boss, organization, coworkers or customers to change because they think when "they" get it right, then the individual will be happy. The fact of the matter is that we are the CPO (Chief Paradise Officer) of our own jobs. We have the ability to create the good life at work everyday through our beliefs, mindset, and actions.

I recommend using the SHIFT™ process for turning aggravations (POWs) at work into satisfactions (WOWs). Based on my consulting and research, I have defined 5 steps which facilitate this process. Please visit the website mentioned above for the specific steps. Hope this helps!

- Posted by Vicki Hess 
August 29, 2008 12:44 PM

Great to see this article.

I first came across Happy when I went on one of their courses some years ago. As a customer I found the attitude and approach of their people quite astonishing. It was a truly rewarding experience. As I got to know more about them and their founder Henry Stewart I came to really appreciate the ethos behind the company - if you create a work environment in which people are genuinely free, you can achieve remarkable results.

Your piece has reminded me that as a manager I need to revise and update my understanding of Happy's principles, and those of similar companies.

- Posted by Malcolm Corbett 
August 29, 2008 2:34 PM

How delightful to get further reinforcement of my passionate belief that "life is too short to be miserable at work"! The promised shorter working week has morphed, for many, into a 24/7 nightmare of connection from dawn to dark (and beyond!). To thrive, we all need to be operating in a work environment that makes us feel happy. It's wonderful to know that there is also a definite business advantage to creating a positive workplace - a profit boost!

- Posted by Helen Macdonald 
September 1, 2008 10:10 PM

Great article. I love that list from Happy - sounds like a great place to work. They are all brilliant ways of making work a pleasure. My 3 favourites are:

Recruit for attitude - attitude is the key to success.
Recruit/promote managers based on their skills with people
The importance of catching people doing things right.

Whilst I really like the one about celebrating mistakes, I think it's a hard one to get right. I am currently coaching someone who is perceived to have made a mistake. He is recognised to be a highly valued employee, so instead of punishing him, his organisation are investing in coaching to help him get better at what he is doing. What a great way to encourage and motivate people. If only more organisations worked like that...

- Posted by Hilary Jeanes 
September 30, 2008 9:30 AM

I have only just come across your article Gill, not in the middle of Summer but in a freezing December, though it has not affected my happiness!

An interesting article. You asked Michael for his suggestions for management revolution. You need look no further than the writings of the late W .Edwards Deming. He consistantly advocated change, actually transformation, of the prevailing management approach through the adoption of what he called Management for Quality. One of his aims was not just happiness but JOY in work and learning. Something I hope you would agree with.

Many people have claimed that having tried Deming's approach they have now moved on. Actually few organisations have really internalised his ideas. Toyota being one which has shown consistent growth for sixty years and who, despite the current economic problems are in better shape than their competitors.

- Posted by Alan Clark 
December 30, 2008 12:06 PM

Gill, thank you for sharing your thoughts and for starting an interesting discussion. However, there is one very important element to this topic that has so far not been addressed: Why do people actually go to work? To make money.

Good management based on the principles you listed above is a fantastic way to maximize the output of a workforce - and frankly a nicer way to treat people. But in order to be truly happy at work I believe that people need to see a tangible reward for their efforts beyond base salary and benefits. As much as I enjoy what I do, the fact is that if I didn't need the money, I wouldn't be here. I believe that employees who see clearly that they will be rewarded either through a bonus program or profit sharing (or some other means) if the company exceeds expectations will themselves seek to exceed expectations and will ultimately be more satisfied with their jobs. I believe that this is as important a factor in retaining quality employees as creating a healthy, happy environment.

- Posted by Ned Keitt-Pride 
January 16, 2009 4:44 PM

Join The Discussion

* Required Fields




Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Posting Guidelines

We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.

We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.

  1. No selling of products or services. Let's keep this an ad-free zone.
  2. No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them.
  3. No multimedia. If you want us to know about outside sources, please point to them, Don't paste them in.
We look forward to including your voices on the site - and learning from you in the process.

The editors

Gill Corkindale

Gill Corkindale is an executive coach and writer based in London. She works with managers and leaders from Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East to develop strategies for business effectiveness and personal change. Formerly management editor of the Financial Times, she uses her journalistic skills and business insights to bring a new perspective on global management and leadership.

Introducing Letter from London

Favorite Links

Learn how business innovators like Amazon's Jeff Bezos and Pixar's Ed Catmull achieve breakthrough results.
Harvard Business Review

ADVERTISEMENT

Browse Our Store

Productive Business Dialogue (Simulation)

This simulation will help you learn how to craft conversations that are fact based, minimize defensiveness, and draw out the best thinking from everyone involved.

Measuring Marketing Performance

In many organizations, marketing exists far from the executive suite and the boardroom. Learn how to improve the link between high level corporate strategy and the marketing function.

Management Tip of the Day Enrollment
SPONSORED BY:  

ADVERTISEMENT

Free Downloads