Voices » John Baldoni » Do You Have a Rahm Emanuel on Your Staff?
10:01 AM Friday November 7, 2008
President-elect Barack Obama radiates a cool, steady calmness. Watching him from afar, you cannot imagine him coming down hard on people to get things done; this is not his style and he knows it.
That's why he chose as his chief of staff a man who according to NPR's Morning Edition loves to "win." Brash, bold and abrasive, Rahm Emanuel, a former Clinton White House aide, is opposite of Obama's cool; he's fire and passion backed with relentless drive. For someone of Obama's temperament, Emanuel is an ideal chief of staff, a job that H.R. Haldeman, President Nixon's chief of staff, viewed as being the "president's S.O.B."
Emanuel's selection demonstrates how leaders need to surround themselves with people who complement them, not replicate them. Emanuel's not afraid to ruffle feathers so he can play the heavy when Obama needs someone to twist arms, one of the ways to get things done in Washington. Every senior leader needs someone like Emanuel, perhaps not with the title of chief of staff, but with the power of it. and the power to drive things forward. Here's how.
Control access. The chief of staff manages the leader's most precious resource: his time. He controls the leader's schedule, whom he sees and when he sees him. Strategic access to the boss is critical to getting things done. The chief of staff grants access as a means of influencing outcomes. Essentially the chief of staff says that if you play the game, you see the boss. If you don't play the game, you are frozen out. As a result, you lose your own influence and the ability to get things done. In short order, you'll be gone.
Crack the whip. This is Emanuel's forte; he's not afraid to apply pressure, to play the heavy in service of the cause. By doing so, he allows his President to stand above the fray and if necessary to swoop down and soothe bruised egos, but only after the deal's been done. The same applies in the corporate world; a senior leader needs someone who can cut through bureaucracy so that initiatives are completed on time and on budget.
Tell the truth. Astute senior leaders worry all the time about what they do not know. Like emissaries, wise chiefs of staff keep their eyes open and ears to the ground to find out what's really going on. Each has their own "canaries in the coal mine" who alert them to what people are saying and doing. It's not the gossip that matters; it's news of real progress on initiatives that matter. It's also critical that a chief of staff tells the senior leader when he's wrong. Not many folks have the willingness (or guts) to do that. A chief of staff who can stand up to his boss serves his leader and the organization well.
Emanuel demonstrates one characteristic different from Obama; he's willing to sublimate his leadership to a higher cause. Obama did not wait "his turn" to run for president; he seized his chance. Emanuel is the fourth highest ranking Democratic congressman and was in line sooner than later to become Speaker, assuming the Democrats held serve. So despite his brash exterior, he does possess something else that a chief of staff needs: a sacrifice of personal ambition.
A senior leader who can find someone such as that is a fortunate leader indeed.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3142
No trackbacks have been made to this entry.
Posting Guidelines
We hope the conversations that take place on HarvardBusiness.org will be energetic, constructive, free-wheeling, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.
We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.

John Baldoni is a leadership consultant, coach, and speaker. His work centers on how leaders can use their authority, communications and presence to build trust and drive results. He is the author of six books on leadership, including Lead By Example, 50 Ways Great Leaders Inspire Results. In 2007 John was named one of the world’s top 30 leadership gurus by Leadership Gurus International. For more on John and his work, visit www.johnbaldoni.com.
Follow John on Twitter: twitter.com/johnbaldoni
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael Jackson and the Zombieconomy Umair Haque
How Michael Jackson Became a Brand Icon John Quelch
Debunking Social Media Myths David Armano
A Good Way to Change a Corporate Culture Peter Bregman
Great Communicators Are Great Explainers John Baldoni
Debunking Social Media Myths David Armano
Michael Jackson and the Zombieconomy Umair Haque
How Michael Jackson Became a Brand Icon John Quelch
How to Identify Your Employees' Hidden Talents Steven DeMaio
Why Microsoft Had to Destroy Word Peter Merholz
This simulation will help you learn how to craft conversations that are fact based, minimize defensiveness, and draw out the best thinking from everyone involved.
In many organizations, marketing exists far from the executive suite and the boardroom. Learn how to improve the link between high level corporate strategy and the marketing function.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments
When I first heard that Obama selected Emanuel, I sort of cringed. I worked on the hill and have seen first hand how he gets things done. His leadership style was very abrasive, but he did get things done. At first, I didn't understand his sacrifice in giving up a leadership position (above 4th in line) in 2006. But after reading your blog, I think I understand. Emanuel sees the bigger picture, and that is an important leadership quality to have, especially now when as a country we will have to make sacrifices to create and sustain positive change. Emanuel was instrumental in helping Dems strategize and win in 2008. If the end justifies the means, then Emanuel (I hope) is the right guy to help Obama move forward. I believe that things will change in this next administration, but Washington is also set in its ways and Rahm knows how to navigate those waters.
- Posted by DSM
November 8, 2008 1:16 PM
I agree, there must be more in it for rahm to sacrifice his own stardom. I believe we're seeing the creation of a 3rd party. rahm is key to enlisting lower to mid tier elected members of congress and the senate in making the leap from the current 2 party system.
- Posted by dd
November 10, 2008 3:16 PM
I recognize the "Good Cop-Bad Cop" model that Barack and Emanual will follow. I'm curious as to how this administration balances the approach and is this the right model?
Given the feel-good nature for the President-Elect, will the Emanuel model be successful, or will there be a moderation or variations to what has worked in the past that will develop?.
I think it will be interesting to revisit his performance a year from now.
- Posted by DRM
November 10, 2008 4:09 PM
I am confused - how can a man so committed and tied to the Party line balance another (Obama) who, as witnessed by the voting record, is also tied to the Party line?
- Posted by Paul
November 14, 2008 3:33 PM
It is the hallmark of autorcrats to "get things done".... Look at Hugo Chavez: he is a democatically elected autocrat....
Congrats America!
Marshall
- Posted by mdillon
November 14, 2008 6:04 PM
I agree that Rahm Emanuel's brashness will serve Obama well, though I don't necessarily agree that to become Obama's Chief of Staff he's had to sacrifice his personal ambition--his appointment has certainly raised his profile globally, and it likely won't close doors for him after he's finished.
I hope Emanuel's greatest asset for Obama will be his ability to promote transparency, communication and honesty in the White House. Such qualities can be assets in the business world--Here's one example from Andrew Kakabadse's blog:
http://www.kakabadse.com/2008/11/clear-communication-and-honesty-from-goldman-sachs/
- Posted by Andrew B
November 21, 2008 11:31 AM
This observation is a good one. I wish senior leaders would take heed to it. The one additional observation I would like to add is that senior leaders who hire the Rahm Emanuel's of the world must be extremely confidant in their own ability. The unfortunate trend in today's leaders is that they don't often look to surround themselves with strong leaders because of their insecurities and fear they may be outshined.
- Posted by Melanie
December 18, 2008 12:09 AM